Controlling of data transmission voltage level by cutting

ABSTRACT

Method to control the output signal of signal transmitter in a data system sending data in low voltage net in order to keep the utput signal voltage (U L ) constant, when output signal (U L ) is taken over coupling unit ( 50 ) to the network, whereby the data transmission includes a signal amplifier ( 20 ), a signal filter ( 40 ), a coupling unit ( 50 ) for signal coupling to the network and a source ( 10 ) of signal amplifier operating voltage (U S ). In connection with the signal amplifier ( 20 ) there is a signal clipper ( 30 ) or a function to clip output signal (U OUT ) of signal amplifier ( 20 ) and/or to clip or distort the input signal approaching signal amplifier ( 20 ) and clipping or distortion being directly or indirectly dependent on the output voltage (U L ) of the signal to be sent to the network or on the output current (I OUT ) from signal amplifier ( 20 ).

The invention is suited for control of the voltage level of outgoing signals from transmitters in a data transmitting system sending data in low-voltage network. The aim is to keep the output signal as to its voltage level as constant as possible in the transmitter mains connection that is independent of net impedance, which impedance can sometimes be quite low and thus tending to attenuate the outgoing signal to a degree unfit for use with respect to reliable communication. Usually, by low-voltage a net of 230 V 50 Hz or some other low-voltage net is referred to.

In quite traditional systems the voltage amplitude of the outgoing signal drops strongly, when the impedance is attenuating. The maximum output level (EUROPE) can drop from 122 dBu V even to 16 dBu V (⅙ voltage level) the net impedance then being 1 ohm. Mostly even this kind of systems can work reliably most of the time, but the fact that they are not always working correctly, make them, commercially thinking, unusable. FIG. 1 shows a traditional solution.

In my opinion the most advanced modern techniques is in this respect represented by PCT application WO 01/15334 A1 (Aug. 17, 2000). In it the outgoing signal is kept almost constant in the transmitter mains connection by means of feedback coupling independent of net impedance and frequency. The method is based on the fact that the current feed capacity of the signal amplifier to a network of 230 V 50 Hz working as load is increased the more the lower the network impedance Z_(L) is. The above presented is a system, where in my opinion the signal (sinus shaped) is by no means cut from its peaks, but the signal amplifier pushes the more sinus shaped power to load Z_(L) the lower the Z_(L) is by each frequency. Thus outgoing signal U_(L) across Z_(L) remains almost constant. However, no curve U_(L)=U_(L) (Z_(L)) is presented so there is no knowledge of the outgoing signal level, for instance by low Z_(L) values and also no knowledge of the quality of the invention.

The disadvantage of the feedback coupling system is, however, possible susceptibility against many kinds of disturbances appearing in the network if no interference suppression has been carried out most effectively. Also CE susceptibility tests the transmitters do not pass easily without good EMC characteristics. Effective suppression against interference increases the manufacturing costs of transmitters a little. In this case situation is weakened because feedback signals U_(M) and 1_(M)×R_(CS)=U_(mass) are taken directly from points easily reached by disturbances from a network without suppression. If interference is carried out correctly and properly working, the method disclosed in the respective PCT publication is good.

The aim of this invention is to keep also output voltage U_(L) constant in net impedance Z_(L), with other words independent net impedance Z_(L), but in quite another way, that is by cutting the output voltage of the signal amplifier from its peak, or in another way by cutting or distorting when Z_(L) is high and output voltage U_(L) would without cutting tend to be too high. Alternatively cutting can be carried out by reducing the operating voltage of the signal amplifier so that cutting takes place already in the signal amplifier. After cutting the low pass filter and bandpass filter filter off harmonic waves generated on cutting under maximum level as required by standard. The method as per this invention is characterized in what is presented in the claims.

If the net impedance is low enough no signal cutting takes place but the maximum signal of signal amplifier is fed forward and further as such to the network. Thus an output voltage UL, remaining constant, is achieved also with low net impedance values.

The input voltage U_(IN) of the signal amplifier is of constant amplitude as also the outlet voltage U_(OUT) of the signal amplifier (signal amplifier operating voltage U_(S) is constant, in other words ungovernable). This holds true for the above presented text.

Described above is that cutting of outgoing signal can take place in signal amplifier or after it by cutting it from its peak. Another alternative is that the outgoing signal is cut in the signal amplifier or in subsequent blocks or in some other way. One possibility is ‘zero point cutting’, with other words the signal is cut from the centre so that positive and negative half periods can pass through as far their peaks are concerned, but from the root always a part of the half period is omitted. There are also other possible ways of cutting. If it is the question of a sinusoidal signal, the signal gets distorted on cutting and generated harmonic waves must be filtered off before getting fed into the network. Also such a method can be used that the input signal U_(IN) of signal amplifier is cut from line impedance Z_(L) directly or indirectly by a dependent way.

The control of output voltage UL is in this invention always based on cutting the signal in one way or another. So it is not the question that the signal amplitude is controlled, while the signal is however retaining its original shape. It is quite another way of signal control (ALC and AGC), with other words automatic level control and automatic gain control.

ALC=Automatic Level Control

AGC=Automatic Level Control

In this invention keeping the level of outgoing signal U_(L) constant by the cutting principle takes place so that the transmitter sends a signal in principle at maximum level to the network, but he signal tending to grow by high Z_(L) values is restricted in early blocks by cutting or distorting.

The cutting system has no impact on power consumption, since power supply (U_(S)) must be dimensioned according to the situation of maximum load. Maximum power consumption appears when net impedance Z_(L) is at its lowest and just then the signal is not cut. By high Z_(L) the power consumption is small and the small increase of consumption due to cutting does not have any effect. Even in that respect an advantageous solution.

With respect to interference suppression the invention is advantageous, because usually there is no EMC susceptible feedback (especially when the cutting method is not used controlling the supply voltage source). On transmission-disturbances across the network have no effect neither on transmitter operation in practise nor CE-susceptibility tests. Further, it is of great help that disturbances from the network are attenuated and meet at first the low-pass filter or band-pass filter and another interference suppression. As to its costs the cutting system is really profitable. As additional components for instance a capacitor C (e.g. 1 uF, ceramic or plastic capacitor) and two Zener diodes or, alternatively, a VDR resistor or another corresponding component. Generally, the cost price should be kept as low as possible in order to enable serial production and to be able to compete. The invention can be put into practice at low price and works also in bad interference conditions.

The cutting method according to the invention, as in the PCT-publication presented adjusting method of the outgoing signal level, is good enough for many applications in practise in the network as considered in relation to reliable data transmission.

In the following the invention is disclosed with reference to the enclosed table and drawing figures, where

Table 1 shows outgoing signal U_(L) as function of net impedance Z_(L) without signal cutting and with signal cutting.

FIG. 1 shows a known traditional application.

FIG. 2. shows the invention by means of a block diagram

FIG. 3 shows a practical application.

FIG. 4 show the transmission level of a practical application in the network.

The dots of block diagram marked with small circles are numbered measuring points 5 . . . 61 In association with them an arrow is marked to illustrate voltage and or current symbol.

Block 10 is an adjustable voltage regulator, the out voltage U_(S) of which is adjustable in measuring point 61 by means of voltage U_(ADJ) available from control block 60.

The actual signal to be transmitted (e.g. under 90 kHz, 95-125 kHz, 125-140 kHz or 140-148,5 kHz) can be a sinusoidal or a square signal; input voltage U_(IN) in measuring point 15.

Block 20 is a signal amplifier where the above mentioned input signal is amplified and its great output signal U_(OUT) in measuring point 21 is fed into signal clipper 30. Signal U_(CLP) clipped in this way in measuring point 31 is fed further to the low-pass or band-pass filter 40, the output voltage of which U_(FL) is a very clean sinusoidal wave free of harmonic wave components. Signal U_(FL) in measuring point 41 is fed across coupling block 50 and through transmitter output connector (L-N) to the network, and to ‘ride’ onto the active net voltage U_(N) where it gets in U_(L) size across net impedance Z_(L) in measuring point 51 (U_(N)+U_(L)).

From block 50 output (measuring point 51) signal (U_(N)+U_(L)) is taken to feedback block 60, which gives directly a control voltage U_(ADJ) or another kind of variable proportional to signal U_(L) amplitude in measuring point 61 to control adjustable regulator 10, the direct voltage U_(S) given by it functions as operation voltage of signal amplifier 20. The greater the U_(S) the smaller the U_(L) tends to be and so in signal amplifier 20 the more the U_(OUT) gets clipped from its peak the smaller the U_(S) is. In this the U_(IN) is constant all the time as even the voltage amplification of signal amplifier 20. By so great net impedance values the output signal amplitude U_(L) tending to grow is clipped almost to a constant value. By means of control voltage U_(ADJ) from feedback block 60 or another control variable can instead of adjustable regulator 10 block 20, 30 or 40 be controlled in order to clip or distort the signal.

If, on the other hand, the net impedance Z_(L) is very low, then also U_(L) is very low and U_(S) again at its maximum and there is no clipping in signal amplifier 20 and a maximum signal is achieved to the net impedance. Even by such low net impedances a signal as high as possible can be fed into the network. Block 60 can get into the UL its proportional instead of measuring point 51 (presented above), for instance from measuring point 21, 31 or 41. Since adjustment of output signal U_(L) into a constant value in adjusting the U_(S) is not the most advantageous application, probably more advantageous methods presented in the following will used in signal clipping in order to keep output signal U_(L) constant.

Block 70 is a receiver and blocks 20-40 can also be controlled by direct voltage proportional to the transmission voltage receivable from receiver 70 or by some other control variable.

In the above description signal 30 clipper was not all in function. In the following block 60 is removed, while regulator 10 is continuously feeding constant maximum operating voltage U_(SMAX) as operating voltage of signal amplifier 20. The amplification of signal amplifier is constant, that is so high that output signal U_(OUT) hardly gets clipped at all or just a little from its peaks.

An alternative is to clip input signal U_(IN) the more the greater the Z_(L) and U_(L) are. However, if input signal U_(IN) is kept constant, clipping is carried out in signal clipper 30 in the cheapest way. It takes place so that there is a series resistance in the input connection of signal clipper 30 and after it a capacitor (if needed) followed by two zener diodes, transzorbs, a VDR resistor or some other similar clipping component.

If net impedance Z_(L) is very low, then the output current I_(OUT) of signal amplifier 20 is high. Thereby in serial resistance R of signal clipper 30 there is a great drop of voltage and, for instance, the zener diodes do not clip at all even a whole signal from its top, since the signal voltage across them is so low that the zener voltage is not exceeded. By high Z_(L) values the a the signal will be clipped strongly again. (Ref. FIG. 3).

The signal can be clipped or distorted even in other ways and already in signal amplifier 20 and not until signal clipper 30. It can, for instance, take place as ‘zero point clipping’, whereby the peaks can pass without getting clipped but both signal half periods clipped from their root. It can be carried out by automatic adjustment of base emitter voltages U_(EB) of signal amplifier 20 power transistors in a way dependent on the U_(L) amplitude.

However, common to all adjustment ways is that adjustment takes place clipping the signal in one way or another and that the signals gets strongly distorted. The principle of distortion holds true if the signal amplifier 20 input signal U_(IN) and outgoing signal U_(OUT) are sinusoidal signals. If the signals are square signals, no distortion takes necessarily place even on clipping, since if a square wave is clipped from its peak, in the peak or in the centre, still the signal square shape remains square.

In the following an example is presented of a practical application with reference to FIG. 3 illustrating a practical application.

The operating voltage U_(S) of signal amplifier 20 is a regulated direct voltage, e.g +15 V. Input signal U_(IN) (e.g. 95-125 kHz) can be a sinusoidal or a square wave 5 Vpp. The voltage gain of signal amplifier 20 is constant and of such kind that input signal U_(IN) does not get quite clipped or gets clipped slightly at signal amplifier output (U_(OUT) in measuring point 21). U_(OUT) is as to its amplitude about 15 Vpp either a sinusoidal or a square type signal. There is in signal clipper 30 a serial resistance R (many ohms), a serial capacitor (e.g. 1 uF) and two zener diodes D1 and D2, which do not at low net impedance X_(L) values clip signal U_(CLP) at all or only slightly but at net impedance Z_(L) high values (e.g. 50 ohm) they clip signal U_(CLP) from its peaks to a level determined by the zener diodes. Clipping is based on the fact that the drop of voltage I_(OUT)×R in resistor R is the lower the higher the net impedance Z_(L).

Signal U_(CLP) the voltage level of which was made constant on clipping, is fed through low-pass or band-pass filter 40 and coupling block 50 to the network between phase and neutral. T_(C) is a coupling transformer an C_(C) a coupling capacitor.

Galvanic separation from the network takes place by means of net transformer T and the coupling transformer of signal T_(C). (The coupling transformer could, of course, be even left out and the signal coupled galvanically direct to the network through coupling capacitor C_(C). However, for electrical safety galvanic separation is good).

FIG. 4 shows the signal voltage U_(L) achievable by means of this practical application as function of network impedance Z_(L1). U_(L1) is the output level according to the invention and the traditional and U_(L2) solution.

By means of operating voltage U_(S)=+15 V as level U_(L) and as function of net impedance Z_(L) of signal amplifier 20, without signal clipping (zener diodes D₁ and D₂ excluded) and with signal clipping (zener diodes(D₁ and D₂ included) following values are measured: TABLE 1 Output signal U_(L) as function of net impedance Z_(L) without and with signal clipping U_(L)(Vpp)/Z_(L) (ohm) U_(L)(Vpp)/Z_(L) (ohm) D₁ and D₂ are not 6.0/50 D₁ and D₂ is are 4.1/50 4.8/5 Invention 3.5/5 4.4/2 3.2/2 3.1/1 2.7/1

If the operating voltage U_(S) is increased, then also by very low values (e.g. 1 ohm) of net impedance Z_(L) a higher output signal U_(L) than presented in table 1 and in FIG. 1 is achieved. In practice the significance of this is yet so small that it hardly pays to use an operating voltage higher than U_(S)=+15 V.

Also using signal clipper components more effective and better than the zener diodes it is easier to keep the U_(L) constant. 

1. Method to control the output signal of signal transmitter in a data system sending data in low voltage net in order to keep the output signal voltage (U_(L)) constant, when output signal (U_(L)) is taken over coupling unit (50) to the network, whereby the data transmission includes: a signal amplifier (20) a signal filter (40) a coupling unit (50) for signal coupling to the network. a source (10) of signal amplifier operating voltage (U_(S)), characterized in that in connection to the signal amplifier (20) there is a signal clipper (30) or a function to clip or to distort output signal (U_(OUT)) of signal amplifier (20) and/or to clip or distort the input signal approaching signal amplifier (20) and clipping or distortion being directly or indirectly dependent on the output voltage (U_(L)) of the signal to be sent to the network or on the output current (I_(OUT)) from signal amplifier (20).
 2. Level control method according to claim 1 characterized in that the operating voltage (U_(S)) inversely proportional to output signal (U_(L)) of operating source (10) is delivered to signal amplifier (20).
 3. Level control method according to claim 1 characterized in that the inversely proportional output signal (U_(S)) is delivered under control by means of feedback coupling unit (60)
 4. Level control method according to claim 1 characterized in that on transmission the signal to be sent is clipped or distorted by clipping input signal (U_(IN)) and/or output signal (U_(OUT)) in signal amplifier (20), signal (U_(OUT)) in signal clipper (30) and/or in other blocks directly or indirectly dependent on output signal voltage (U_(L)) or current (I_(OUT)) in order to keep output voltage (U_(L)) as independent as possible on net impedance (Z_(L)).
 5. Level control method according to claim 1 characterized in that operating voltage (U_(S)) of signal amplifier (20) is adjusted by means of an adjustable regulator (10), the output voltage (U_(S)) of which is adjusted by means of feedback block (60) so that output voltage (U_(OUT)) of signal amplifier (20) also gets adjusted by means of said clipping making the output signal voltage (U_(L)) to remain as constant as possible and independent on net impedance (Z_(L)).
 6. Level control method according to claim 1 characterized in that the signal voltage moving to blocks/through blocks 2040 is adjusted by using direct voltage or some other adjusting variable proportional to output signal (U_(L)) achievable from receiver (70) 